<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Will 2012 be &#34;THE END&#34;? &#187; Apocalypse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2012-theend.com/tag/apocalypse/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2012-theend.com</link>
	<description>Observations and insights into the end times and the apocalypse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal 2012 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.2012-theend.com/wall-street-journal-2012-review/19</link>
		<comments>http://www.2012-theend.com/wall-street-journal-2012-review/19#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe morgenstern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cusack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woody harrelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2012-theend.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Morgenstern didn&#8217;t seem to think it was a great movie&#8230; too long mostly and formulaic. Too bad. Roland Emmerich&#8217;s other films were kind of epic and interesting, but apparently this one did not make the grade. I&#8217;ll still go see it eventually, or maybe wait until it&#8217;s on DVD and will probably enjoy it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Morgenstern didn&#8217;t seem to think it was a great movie&#8230; too long mostly and formulaic. Too bad. Roland Emmerich&#8217;s other films were kind of epic and interesting, but apparently this one did not make the grade. I&#8217;ll still go see it eventually, or maybe wait until it&#8217;s on DVD and will probably enjoy it. But the length of the movie is a little troublesome. I always prefer a 90 minute movie. Still, John Cusack is always entertaining to watch, and you can&#8217;t go wrong with Woody!</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704576204574531491995138998.html">WSJ review</a></p>
<p>Have some comment or want to share information about another movie? Please register and post on<br />
<a href="http://www.ReviewTheMovies.com">http://www.ReviewTheMovies.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.2012-theend.com/wall-street-journal-2012-review/19/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
